Civil society has burgeoned since a public uprising ended the Syrian occupation of Lebanon in 2005, with over 8,000 CSOs reported to exist, working on issues including conflict resolution and human rights as well as service delivery.read more
VIDEO: Hundreds of Lebanese demonstrate in Beirut against rampant corruption and poor living conditions, with some wearing yellow vests in reference to the protests in France, as anger mounts over political deadlock that has left the country without a government since May pic.twitter.com/OHvbrRc9Hf— AFP news agency (@AFP) December 24, 2018
In December 2018, Lebanon saw a number of anti-government protests prompted by the current political stalemate which has prevented the formation of a government since May 2018. In response, people in Lebanon have mobilised to decry worsening economic and social conditions in the country.
On 23rd December 2018, several hundred people marched through Beirut denouncing the current political deadlock, and calling for an end to corruption, better social services and respect for citizens “basic rights”. Some of the protesters wore yellow vests, adopting the symbol of France’s “yellow vest” anti-government protests. During the protest in Beirut, protesters marched towards the government buildings and spread into the streets around the city. Video reports from the protest shows armed military personnel and armoured tanks being deployed to the area of the protest. Brief clashes between Lebanese security forces and the protesters quickly followed. Authorities claim the clashes were started when some protesters allegedly threw water bottles, burned rubbish and threw rubbish bins at the Lebanese security personnel, and attempted to block roads. Security forces and army personnel responded by beating protesters and assaulting journalists with batons. The use of force was verified through multiple media reports and journalist eyewitness accounts.
The Lebanese army issued a statement from the Army Command, dated 26th December, stating that it respected the freedom of expression and peaceful protest and the “freedom of responsible media” but noted that it “will not be tolerant" with those who "target the image of security forces and stir tumult and chaos in the country”.
'Yellow vest' protest decries Lebanon living conditions https://t.co/M5R1nlONdt— Lebanon observer (@LebanonObserve) December 23, 2018
The protest on 23d December 2018 followed several smaller protests that occurred earlier in December:
Despite clearly identifying themselves, at least four journalists covering the protest on 23rd December 2018 in Beirut were assaulted by the security forces, including army personnel, deployed to the protest,:
We are alarmed by the jailing without charge of Syrian journalist Abdel Hafez al-Houlani and call on Lebanese authorities to release him immediately, https://t.co/IxL4SZORJp— Sherif Mansour (@sherifmnsour) November 26, 2018
Report released in December 2018 by the Media Ownership Monitor (MOM), reveals high political affiliation of the media in Lebanon. According to the report, almost 80% of the media outlets were either directly owned by the State, current or former members of parliament or the executive, parliamentary candidates, or by political parties. The MOM is a new joint project by Reporters without Borders and the Lebanese NGO Samir Kassir Foundation. The MOM also found that the media is concentrated in the hands of a few powerful families, as at least 12 big family dynasties involved in the media sector – one of which is the Prime Minster’s Hariri family, who has stakes in all four media sectors (print and online, radio and TV).
In this environment of threatened media independence, violations against journalists, as previously covered by the CIVICUS Monitor, remain a serious concern. For 2018, Samir Kassir Eyes documented 61 different violations against media in Lebanon - including cases of censorship of media, prosecution, harassment, detention and imprisonment of journalists many for their critical reporting.
Journalists continue to be targeted for investigations and arbitrarily arrested in connection to their journalistic work:
CIVICUS has documented a worrying trend of authorities in Lebanon harassing, interrogating and arbitrarily detaining journalists and human rights defenders solely for their peaceful and legitimate activities in defence of human rights. Given these hostile actions systematically used by state forces against journalists and civil society, many have claimed that there is a deteriorating situation for free speech.
Article 13 of the Constitution establishes the freedom of association. CSOs of most kinds do not need permission to form; they must merely notify the state of their formation. Grounds for the rejection of notification include jeopardising the monarchy and challenging the government.
Article 13 of the Constitution establishes the freedom of association. CSOs of most kinds do not need permission to form; they must merely notify the state of their formation. Grounds for the rejection of notification include jeopardising the monarchy and challenging the government. Foreign associations require permission to establish themselves and to vary their operations, trade unions also need prior permission and are subject to strict oversight, and the illegality of LGBTI relations hinders LGBTI CSOs from organising. Refugees from Palestine, who are present in large numbers, are not allowed to form CSOs. CSOs must submit annual reports to the state, although in practice these are little scrutinised, making the exercise a formality, and otherwise, at present, there is little state interference. There are allegations of clientelism and corruption in the state’s distribution of resources to CSOs.
The freedom of assembly is guaranteed in Article 13 of the Constitution, and the law requires notification two days in advance rather than prior permission to hold a peaceful assembly.
The freedom of assembly is guaranteed in Article 13 of the Constitution, and the law requires notification two days in advance rather than prior permission to hold a peaceful assembly. Assembly organisers are held responsible for any violations, including for speeches that contravene freedom of expression restrictions. The authorities may prevent assemblies if they obstruct public roads or are deemed likely to disturb public morality and security, and there are also instances of excessive force being used against assemblies by security forces. Mass protests, under the "You Stink" banner, sparked in 2015 by the failure to collect rubbish and quickly encompassed broader issues of corruption and government failure, involving over 100,000 people. These were significant protests because they crossed sectarian and partisan lines. The protests attracted security force violence and a number of protesters were referred to military courts on charges of rioting, violence and destruction of property, indicative of a broader trend towards the use of military courts. There have also been street protests calling for progress on electoral reform in 2016 and 2017, as part of the ‘We Want Accountability’ movement.
The Constitution’s Article 13 upholds the freedom of expression, and citizens are broadly free to express their views and criticise politicians and public institutions. However, the Penal Code criminalises defamation of the president, the army and other public officials, with recent instances of convictions.
The Constitution’s Article 13 upholds the freedom of expression, and citizens are broadly free to express their views and criticise politicians and public institutions. However, the Penal Code criminalises defamation of the president, the army and other public officials, with recent instances of convictions. The Press Law prohibits the publication of news that goes against public ethics, national unity and religious feelings, without clearly defining these. Other laws also contain broad and vague terminology. As a consequence, the Court of Publications has imposed jail sentences and heavy fines on journalists who have reported on issues such as judicial corruption and arms trafficking. CSOs are involved in trying to bring forward a new Press Law. Political polarisation has affected the freedom of expression, as many media are partisan, which can encourage self-censorship and also makes it hard for civil society to gain visibility, although print media have more independence. There are also attacks on journalists by non-state actors, notably on a TV station in 2017. The state does not restrict internet access, and this is growing, but a number of people have been interrogated over social media posts. After considerable civil society advocacy, a right of access to information law was passed in 2017.