The Polish constitution enshrines protections for the rights to freedom of expression, association and assembly, and these rights have for the most part been respected.read more
The Polish authorities took measures to restrict the visibility of a 40-day long protest by parents of people with disabilities.
In April 2018, parents of children with disabilities in Poland held protests demanding an increase in disability benefits provided by the state. The protestors occupied the Polish Sejm (parliament) but authorities allegedly hid them behind a thick, grey curtain in order to reduce the visibility of their protest. During the protest, the children's physiotherapists were denied entry into the Parliament building as were other parents who gathered outside in the streets with their children.
Parents and children with disabilities end 40-day sit-in at Poland's parliament; they were seeking an increase in support payments. https://t.co/Qe0fEetHeW
— The Associated Press (@AP) May 27, 2018
Dorota Głowacka, lawyer at the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (Poland) told the CIVICUS Monitor, that the authorities' response to the protest was very disturbing. The protesters had to endure very difficult conditions and were often subject to mistreatment and smear campaigns.
Protestors subsequently called off the protest on 27th May, fearing for their children's health after living in a corridor of the Parliament building with access to one bathroom for forty days .
Related to the protest by parents of disabled children, Głowacka noted that access to the Parliament building was heavily restricted, including for journalists using one-time entry cards who could not enter the parliamentary premises for several weeks. As a consequence media had limited ability to cover the ongoing protest but were also not able to, for example, participate in parliamentary committees and provide first-hand information to the public at the time. She emphasised that journalists’ ability to report freely on parliamentary proceedings, actions of elected representatives and other events in parliament is an essential element of exercising freedom of expression and fulfilling “public watchdog” role by media. It also means that the public can be fully informed about the issues which are matters of highest public concern. Any restriction on the access of media to parliament should be thoroughly justified and based on fair and transparent procedures.
“Unfortunately in this case the ban imposed on journalists was very arbitrary and therefore, in my opinion, violated media freedom.”-
In a separate development, a Polish satire journalist Antoni Szpak, was indicted in May on a charge of “insulting the Polish nation” in a column published in December 2017. The column criticised links between the Polish authorities and the Catholic Church and mocked politicians relationships to church officials. If found guilty, Szpak could face up to three years in prison. International Press Institute (IPI) Deputy Director Scott Griffen told ipi.media that the prosecution of Szpak violated international standards on freedom of expression.
“Numerous international human rights bodies have urged states to repeal criminal laws protecting the honour of the state and state institutions precisely due to the danger that such laws can be abused to punish and silence critical voices”, he said. “The charge against Mr. Szpak perfectly illustrates that danger and should be dropped immediately.”
In late March 2018, the Ministry of the Interior and Administration (MSWiA) abandoned its plans to amend the Public Collections Act after NGOs, backed by a citizen appeal signed by 112,000 people, protested the move. The proposed amendment was intended to prevent fundraising efforts such as the one organised by the Pride and Modernity association (Duma i Nowoczesność) to collect donations for a convicted murderer, that was considered to be contrary to public policy. The amendment, framed in ambiguous and broadly language, would have given officials broad discretion and the ability to arbitrarily decide which causes were in the public interest and could therefore be supported by public donations.
Freedom of association is generally respected in law and practice in Poland, where a wide range of civil society groups and unions operate without undue interference. There are however concerns that provisions of the new anti-terrorism bill, and provisions of a new Police Act adopted in February 2016, may be used to target individuals and groups working on sensitive topics or expressing dissenting opinions. Specifically, these laws give the authorities wide-ranging powers to conduct surveillance and access personal information, without sufficient safeguards.
Most recently, tens of thousands took to the streets and organized other meetings and events as part of the “Black protests” to express their opposition to a proposed total ban on abortion.
Freedom of peaceful assembly is generally respected, and protests occur with regularity. Most recently, tens of thousands took to the streets and organized other meetings and events as part of the “Black protests” to express their opposition to a proposed total ban on abortion. Days after the protests, lawmakers rejected the proposal. However, the new anti-terrorism law contains provisions which seriously undermine protected rights. Under the new law, where a sufficiently high ‘state of alarm’ is declared, the Minister of Internal Affairs may order a prohibition on public assembly. Evidentiary support is not required to declare a state of alarm. The law also allows for heightened surveillance, increased police powers to search individuals, and in some cases increased power to shoot to kill.
The media in Poland is mostly independent and diverse, and freedom of expression and freedom from censorship are constitutionally protected.
The media in Poland is mostly independent and diverse, and freedom of expression and freedom from censorship are constitutionally protected. However, these protections are to some extent undermined by subsidiary laws, including those which make defamation a criminal offence. There are also fears that the new government is seeking to exert greater control over the media. The new anti-terrorism law allows for websites to be blocked without prior judicial order. Additionally, at the end of 2015, parliament passed a law allowing a government minister to appoint and dismiss the supervisory and management boards of public television and radio, thereby undermining guarantees for their independence. President Duda signed the law on 7 January 2016, despite vigorous protests from civil society, the OSCE, and the EU.