Civic space is constrained in Maldives and people’s ability to organise, speak out and take action is being increasingly shut down through laws and other actions of the state.read more
Fundamental freedom continues to be restricted in the Maldives and a new human rights report shows the government has moved to expand its use of broad and vaguely worded laws to intimidate, arbitrarily arrest, and imprison its critics ahead of elections scheduled for 23 September 2018.
Fundamental freedoms continue to be restricted in the Maldives. A new report by Human Rights Watch released in mid-August 2018 shows the government has moved to expand its use of broad and vaguely worded laws to intimidate, arbitrarily arrest, and imprison its critics ahead of elections scheduled for 23rd September 2018. The report examines how the government is “using and abusing such laws, and the crippling effects this has had on the Maldives’ nascent democracy and struggling civil society”.
In mid-July 2018, the Foreign Affairs Council of the European Union warned of sanctions ranging from travel bans to asset freezes against those in the Maldives responsible for human rights violations and undermining the rule of law in the Indian Ocean island chain. The decision was a direct follow up to the Foreign Affairs Council conclusions of 26th February that urged President Yameen’s government to engage with opposition leaders for credible, transparent and inclusive presidential elections, the European Union said.
Rights group calls government to drop prosecution of critics
New @hrw report on the #Maldives released today finds that the Yameen government is crushing any dissent, from activists and journalists to Supreme Court judges. https://t.co/n3E0KtTANs pic.twitter.com/4AOs3Gy4vM— meenakshi ganguly (@mg2411) August 16, 2018
According to the report from Human Rights Watch, threats and prosecutions against the media and opposition critics increased after the August 2016 enactment of the Anti-Defamation and Freedom of Expression Act. The law sets heavy fines for content or speech that “contradicts a tenet of Islam, threatens national security, contradicts social norms, or encroaches on another’s rights, reputation, or good name”. Patricia Gossman, associate director of the HRW Asia division, said:
"This is a problem that really goes back several years with the enactment of laws that criminalise peaceful dissent, make it very difficult for opposition parties to function and really crack down on the media.”
The organisation has called on the government to drop all prosecutions and release anyone being held for the peaceful exercise of their basic rights, including the right to peaceful expression. This includes all criminal investigations and charges brought against individuals for their criticism of government officials, institutions, or judicial decisions.
#VIDEO: Maldives Broadcasting Commission slapped an MVR2 million fine on @Raajje_tv, saying this content defamed President Yameen. The station’s repeated requests to clarify how this defamed the president were ignored pic.twitter.com/4rLoZDSJPa— Raajjemv English (@RaajjeEnglish) August 19, 2018
On 8th August 2018, private broadcaster Raajje TV was imposed with a fine of MVR 2 million (130,000 USD) under the 2016 Anti-Defamation and Freedom of Expression Act, for live broadcasting a politician’s speech from an opposition demonstration. The fine was approved after the opposition-aligned station was found to have aired content that threatened national security, the the Maldives Broadcasting Commission (MBC) said in a statement.
Raajje TV in a statement said it believed that this was “a calculated and well-coordinated attack to obstruct its efforts to make President Yameen’s government accountable ahead of next month’s presidential election. We note that the commission’s report on its decision is filled with fabrications”.
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) condemned the arbitrary decision to fine the media outlet. The organisation said:
“The IFJ condemns the decision of the Maldives Broadcasting Commission to fine on Raajje TV. The media outlet should not be held responsible for the comments made by politicians during broadcast. This is the fourth fine in two years and shows that the MBC is attempting to silence opposition voices and muzzling with press freedom through the draconian defamation act. The IFJ demands immediate withdrawal of the fine and urge the Maldives government to respect press freedom and freedom of expression.”
Raajje TV, among the biggest private broadcasters in the Maldives, has repeatedly been targeted by the authorities on defamation charges. The network has already been fined several times under the 2016 anti-defamation law by the regulatory Maldives Broadcasting Commission
On 2nd August 2018, a criminal court in the Maldives acquitted two men accused of kidnapping a prominent journalist who wrote pointed critiques of the government and the spread of radical strains of Islam.
Ahmed Rilwan, a reporter with the Maldives Independent newspaper, was likely abducted in August 2014 and has been missing since. Alif Rauf and Mohamed Nooradeen were accused of forcing Rilwan into a car at knife-point outside his apartment building in Hulhumalé on 8th August 2014. Both were arrested shortly after his disappearance but remained free for the duration of the trial.
The weak police investigation into Rilwan’s case and concerns about the credibility of the trial has raised serious questions about the willingness of the state to bring the perpetrators to justice. Some believe that the disappearance of Ahmed Rilwan and the incomplete investigation that followed were state-sponsored.
The Committee to Protect Journalists, Asia Program Coordinator Steven Butler said:
"The four years in which Ahmed Rilwan Abdulla has been missing has been a bleak period for press freedom in the Maldives, not least because of the lack of accountability in his case…President Abdulla Yameen Abdul Gayoom should demonstrate that his government is committed to ensuring full justice by supporting an independent investigation into the journalist's disappearance."
Strangely #Maldivian Athourities last week allowed #Protesters to march in marking 4th years since the dissaperance of #Maldivian Blogger/Journalist Ahmed #Rilwan who happens to be a close freind of #Blogger @yaamyn stabbed by #Islamists last year@ciceline pic.twitter.com/2sxtHpxenc— Salvin Yula (@SalvinYula) August 11, 2018
On 8th August 2018, a protest was held in the capital Male, to mark four years since the abduction of Maldives Independent journalist Ahmed Rilwan. Led by Rilwan’s parents and family, about 250 people marched half the length of the capital’s main road as a small group of police officers diverted traffic. The march ended with a gathering at Malé’s western artificial beach where former colleagues, members of civil society and Rilwan’s father delivered speeches.
Calling for an independent inquiry, protesters chanted, “It’s been four years, where is Rilwan?” “The knife went missing, Rilwan is still missing,” and “Investigate President [Abdulla] Yameen”. They held up placards with photos of state officials accused of complicity, including the president, his jailed former deputy, and the prosecutor general.
In stark contrast to previous years, police officers cleared the way for a protest march. It was the first protest march in the capital without police obstruction since late 2015.
According to Human Rights Watch’s report, the government has used the 2015 Anti-Terrorism Act, with its overly broad and ambiguous provisions, to prosecute acts of political dissent during and after the 45-day state of emergency that was lifted on 22nd March 2018. The law includes as acts of terrorism “disrupting public services” for the purpose of “exerting an undesirable influence on the government or the state,” a definition that could apply to protests. Of the scores of opposition figures and activists detained during the state of emergency, most were charged with committing “acts of terrorism.”
Among the opposition politicians who have been charged under this law for their political activism include Ilhaam Ahmed, Ahmed Mahloof, Faris Maumoon, Abdullah Riyaz and Abdullah Sinan.
On 27th June 2018, Faris Maumoon, an opposition politician in the Maldives, was sentenced to four months and 24 days in prison for identity fraud. He was accused of illegally using the flag and logo of the Progressive Party of Maldives during a press conference held on 22 March 2017.
Amnesty International considers Faris Maumoon a prisoner of conscience and has raised concerns about his trial that according to them, did not meet fair trial standards. According to the organisation, the prosecution presented anonymous witnesses – who could not be cross examined – and failed to share case documents with his defense lawyers, as required by the new Criminal Procedures Act. Faris Maumoon submitted a list of 47 people as witnesses, but only 10 received summons. The rest were not heard.
Faris Maumoon is facing five other politically motivated criminal charges: three cases of bribery, a case of corruption, and a case of attempting to commit terrorism. Criminal charges have been pressed in the one bribery case and the one related to terrorism, while the last information given to Faris Maumoon’s lawyer is that the prosecution is still investigating the other two bribery cases.
On 13th June 2018, Maumoon Abdul Gayoom, who was President of the Maldives from 1978 to 2008 was sentenced to one year, seven months and six days in prison for failing to hand over his mobile phone to investigators. He was charged and convicted after being found guilty of “obstructing justice”.
Amnesty International’s South Asia Director, Biraj Patnaik, said the conviction was politically-motivated, and the product of a trial that did not meet international standards. The organisation called for the conviction to be quashed immediately.
The 2003 Associations Act imposes rigorous rules for the incorporation, registration and operation of NGOs.
The 2003 Associations Act imposes rigorous rules for the incorporation, registration and operation of NGOs. To access funds, NGOs must also go through the Registrar of Associations, who is a political appointee, has the power to register or dissolve associations and does not recognise human rights organisations or trade unions. This is a clear impediment to NGOs which are critical of the state, and to unregistered associations, which are criminalised under the Act. In 2013, the Minister of Home Affairs raised concerns when he announced that he would dissolve about 70% of NGOs for not adhering to financial reporting requirements. In 2016, the NGO Maldivian Democracy Network was raided by the security forces for allegedly trying to overthrow the government. The executive director of that NGO has in the past been threatened with rape, disappearance and violence. In 2015, human rights lawyer Mahfooz Saeed was attacked and injured after making a speech in which he criticised the government.
Although protests do take place, the freedom of peaceful assembly is significantly compromised in Maldives.
Although protests do take place, the freedom of peaceful assembly is significantly compromised in Maldives. In 2015, hundreds of opposition party supporters staging peaceful protests were arrested and released with no charge after days and in some cases weeks, some on the condition that they would not participate in future protests. A state of emergency was also declared on 4th November 2015, effectively banning all protests. In 2012, the security forces attacked peaceful protestors at a rally using excessive force and seriously injuring protestors. Security forces are also known to use pepper spray on protestors especially those of the opposition party Maldivian Democratic Party. Once such incident took place in 2012 when a protester was stabbed and the party offices destroyed. The Freedom of Peaceful Assembly Act was also recently amended with all protests now requiring prior permission from the state.
Free expression is not fully protected in practice in Maldives, with journalists receiving death threats and being harassed without meaningful investigations being carried out.
Free expression is not fully protected in practice in Maldives, with journalists receiving death threats and being harassed without meaningful investigations being carried out. In 2015, the Public Service Media Act was passed but was seen as an attempt to turn the public broadcaster into a mouthpiece of the state. The situation deteriorated further in 2016 with the introduction of the Protection of Reputation and Good Name and Freedom of Expression Act, which criminalised speech seen as defamatory. The law also imposes hefty fines or jail terms for defamation. Reporters are mandated by law to have accreditation to cover protests, while journalists face routine harassment and arrests by the state leading to self-censorship.
In 2012, blogger Ismail Khilath Rasheed was attacked and detained for organising a peaceful protest for religious tolerance. The 2014 disappearance of prominent journalist Ahmed Rilwan Abdulla, whose whereabouts remain unknown, continue to cast a shadow over press freedom in Maldives. His colleagues’ efforts to find him, including a press conference and a rally to mark one year since his disappearance, were disrupted by security forces. In 2016, a documentary exposing government corruption entitled ‘Stealing Paradise’ aired on Al Jazeera. Shortly afterwards, the editor of the Maldives Independent newspaper, Zaheena Rasheed, who featured in the documentary, had to flee the country due to concerns for her safety. Also in 2016, 16 journalists were arrested for staging a peaceful sit-in outside the President’s office.