Wat een diepgeworteld wantrouwen in de burger spreekt hier van uit. @greenpeace_be vervoegt oa @MijnNatuurpunt om dit voor het Grondwettelijk Hof te brengen. #codextreinhttps://t.co/EisDaQ6rSI pic.twitter.com/HOb2wenFwD
— Joeri Thijs (@JoeriThijs) November 29, 2017
Association
Seven civil society groups have joined forces to take the Flemish government to the Constitutional Court over legal provisions in the so-called 'codextrein', which will change the Flemish Codex on Spatial Planning, thereby curtailing citizen's abilities to appeal "against major construction projects" in their surroundings. Environmental groups, in particular, are concerned that limiting citizens' possibilities to influence and potentially oppose the type and location of proposed construction projects would threaten "the scarce open space in Flanders".
Natuurpunt, Bond Beter Leefmilieu (BBL), Greenpeace, StRaten-Generaal, Ademloos (Breathless), Vogelbescherming Vlaanderen (Bird Protection), among others, will challenge the state, claiming that the government's actions contravene the constitution which "stipulates that those who want to protect their right to a healthy environment must be given access to justice".
#Europe Court upholds #Belgium face veil ban, sending dangerous message its ok to limit women's rights, freedom @hrw https://t.co/JC7mcC4NbL
— Hillary Margolis (@hillarymargo) July 14, 2017
Expression
In July 2017, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in favour of the Belgian ban on full-face veils enacted in 2011. Some human right advocates worry that “these rulings embolden other governments to dictate how women can dress, and send a dangerous message that it is acceptable to curtail women’s freedom of expression and belief".